Actually the Signature Series allies do have datamined images.The thing is,when they were added,they had extra space,wich made them look weird on the template. The only thing I did was remove the useless black space. (These are,respectively,the original and current versions of Signature Saibra file. The same happens for the others)
Well! Thanks for informing. I just remembered, that you told me, that You don't know how to datamine. And those images have You as an author. So I actually thought, that they weren't datamined. Sorry for that. So no need to reupload them. :)
I just have done them. I had *died* during the organisation of the game conference, but right now I came back to life (how fitting for a Halloween :D). From now on if you need something I should be available too.
EDIT: Also, the Clockworks on the level page use outdated images.
Kung Who to the rescue! Actually I have done them already at the morning, but some stuff occured that made me go out before I was able to upload them. Lately I have some free time only on weekends, and when something happens i end up being two weeks behind like this.
I uploaded daleks, updated enemy zygons and closeup angels. Will double check if the ally zygons use the same image before upload. Do we need anything else for now?
I checked again, but I still haven't found any new ally images (for John Jones). I did find a new enemy image since the last time I uploaded images; do we need any of those? I'm not sure what it is, some kind of cloaked figure.
I don't think we need any enemy images currently. I'm guessing that the cloaked figure is the image of the Warrior Monks that will come on the "Directors Cut",and that it was added on the game database early
Fiveofeight wrote: I checked again, but I still haven't found any new ally images (for John Jones). I did find a new enemy image since the last time I uploaded images; do we need any of those? I'm not sure what it is, some kind of cloaked figure.
So,I was thinking. A while ago,we used to add screenshots of enemies while the datamined versions of the files were not uploaded.
It seems that,for some reason,John Jones is not showing up when you try to datamine them. Is it ok if I add a screenshot of those images (with the correct file name already)? This way,the wiki readers will already have a image,and later it can be directly replaced with the datamined version,trough the File page
Can someone plase post ALL the graphics we need added? I mean, all, that are not datamined and uploaded. I will do my best. Just post the list, as I believe, that there are some missed previous adds. :)
I'll be back on wednesday/thursday after I finish my exams. I got the premium pack bought today and have about a month of stuff to catch up (fan area etc.) as well, so I can rip images as I'll go through content. Let me know what you need.
River Song Darillium
River Song Cape
River Song Spy
River Song Dinner
John Jones Xavi Moonburst
John Jones Performing
Twelfth Pixelated Guitar
Hydroflax with Ramone Head
Hydroflax with Nardole Head
Trickster Sarah Jane Smith
Trickster The Tenth Doctor
Hydroflax (original head)
Cybernetic head only (Hydroflax)
Warrior Monk facing left
Warrior Monk facing right
Telos Cyberman black helmet
Telos Cyberman silver helmet
I added this link (to make it clear that this only random speculation - because I think that we shouldn't deal with any random speculation in the first place), so you kinda addressing the wrong user.
But where is that agreement that Facebook comments are invalid? I can't remember anything like that (there was some discussion about whether Twitch is valid/invalid during that 4th Doctor work in progress picture thing).
What? Are you implying that TRG doesn't control who posts as "Doctor Who: Legacy" on Facebook? I don't see a difference between a Facebook post or a Facebook comment (or an announcement/post on the TRG website) as long as it originates from a TRG-account. If you say "Doctor Who: Legacy" is not a official source we need to forbid all Facebook information which seems ridiculous to me.
[It could be that you just removed the link without really checking it. The link doesn't directly target to a TRG comment, but to a comment TRG answered to. I'm not sure if it possible to directly link to that, but that doesn't make the source invalid.]
1) Which previous discussion has happened on this topic? I couldn't find any by searching for "Facebook" on the wiki.
2) The hiccup KungWho mentioned didn't involve "Doctor Who: Legacy", but people using "Sharee MacDonald"'s post as source.
3) As KungWho said, it is basically irrelevant whether Sharee (or anyone else) can post on Facebook (or anywhere else) as DWL.
If you say "comments can be from Sharee, so they can't be sources", I say: "posts can be from Sharee, so they can't be sources either". Both statements are of equal correctness. Either we treat "Doctor Who: Legacy" as an official source or we don't.
It's really great that you are interested in adding upcoming content (and I don't want you to stop that), but it would be appreciated if you limit upcoming information to Category:Upcoming pages.
Regular wiki pages reflect the current ingame status, and upcoming content just isn't available yet, which makes it awkward for people who don't know that fact. E.g. someone reading "Cyberman Skin" at the available gem skins might think it is some sort of bug that he can't see that skin. (And adding this information with a TBA doesn't really improve the readability of the article either.)
Could you name the images you upload something meaningful rather than seemingly arbitrary strings of numbers? Even if the images show up just fine in articles, it makes it more difficult to find and use them when the filename doesn't have any meaning for the editor. It also makes it easier to maintain images if the names are meaningful. So for example, the last two images you uploaded might have been named "Rory Centurion preview.[ext]" and "Rusty preview.[ext]" or similar (where [ext] is the file extension, png in this case).
I could move them myself, but I'm not sure myself whether we'll even use these preview images in other articles than the spoiler ones. In any case, it would be simpler if you just started uploading images with more meaningful names from now on.
I've seen you started articles on both (and it is nice to have them when we need them).
Since they aren't yet available, I think the only category these pages should be is the Category:Upcoming, so that it isn't possible to find them in the current categories like allies that are currently in game.
Putting them into the normal categories makes it easier for other people to accidentally find these pages without being able to find them ingame, which imo is just confusing.
Mh, your right that some people say they are released. But why does my game still say that the total companion number is 87? (Of which I have 82, one is Rose Tyler and three are Silent Priests. Only one slot left for another ally)
Do those allies don't count against the normal maximum?
I'm not 100% sure what it is for, but the name implies a connection to Category:Discontinued content, but the Fan Area is still accessible ingame.
Since I believe you made this edit for a reason, I would like to understand it :).
Edit: I see Alpha1812 has undo'ed your edit, but nevertheless I would like to hear why you made that change. Maybe it was something that would be a great idea and you used the wrong category name or something.